CHI 2005 April 2 through 7 Portland, OregonCHI 2005 Home

Conference Overview
Conference Committee
Exhibiting & Recruiting
About Portland

Our Sponsors

Conference Program

Conference Program

Presenting at CHI



Student Volunteers

Call For Participation

Submissions Overview
Archived CFPs
All submissions closed



What's in a CHI Review?


Rate your expertise in the topic area of this paper.

Contribution to HCI

State what contribution the paper makes to the field of Human-Computer Interaction in your view.

The Review

Write your review of the paper here. Please address each of the following 4 issues:
  • Relevant previous work of which you are aware, against which this paper's contribution should be assessed.
  • Significance of the paper's contribution to HCI and the benefit that others can gain from the contribution: why do the contribution and benefit matter?
  • Validity of the work presented: how confidently can researchers and practitioners take up the results?
  • Originality of the work: what new ideas or approaches are introduced?

We want to emphasize that an acceptable paper must make a clear contribution to Human-Computer Interaction. CHI values substance and contribution more than formality and perfection.

Areas for Improvement

Identify aspects of the paper's written presentation that need improvement, including:


  • 5 - Definite accept: I would argue strongly for accepting this paper.
  • 4 - Probably accept: I would argue for accepting this paper.
  • 3 - Borderline: Overall I would not argue for accepting this paper.
  • 2 - Probably reject: I would argue for rejecting this paper.
  • 1 - Definite reject: I would argue strongly for rejecting this paper.

Additional Comments:

CHI 2005 April 2 - 7 SIGCHIPortland, Oregon, USA SIGCHIBack to Top SIGCHI